A Washington County Ohio judge wants to
punish 55
people for the “crime” of failure to report for compulsory jury service as ordered
by the court. He plans to slap them all with court fees and/or possibly arrest and
incarceration for violating his order.
This scenario happens every day in jurisdictions
all over America. A Court clerk randomly selects a list of people from the
community for potential jury service. The judge signs an order to summon those on
the list to appear before the court at a designated time and place and subject themselves
to compulsory service on a jury panel.
The judge claims the power to compel or
excuse jury service at his whim. If compelled to serve on a case, the juror may
be forced to cooperate for days, weeks, or even months at a time as the case
may require. That juror is obliged to leave his or her normal life behind and
show up every day for service. In some instances the judge may even sequester
them in a hotel and order them not to carry on their usual activities and
contacts until their service is concluded.
There’s a big problem with this in my
opinion: It’s unconstitutional.
The Thirteenth Amendment of the United
States Constitution specifically provides that: "Neither slavery nor
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party
shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States or any
place subject to their jurisdiction."
What could possibly be more plain and
unambiguous as that? If a person has not been duly convicted of a crime for
which punishment is prescribed by law, no judge has the power to impose
involuntary servitude upon that person in the form of compulsory jury service –
period.
Leaving that aside however; as a
lawyer, the last thing I want for my client in a jury trial is a juror sitting
in judgment on the case who doesn’t want to be there. The first question I
always ask a jury panel is whether anyone present would rather not serve. If
anyone raises their hand I always ask the judge to excuse that person for
cause. That’s because a juror serving involuntarily is likely to be an unfair
juror – a juror who doesn’t care.
That’s why jury service must me
voluntary. Compulsory jury service is involuntary servitude – unconstitutional courtroom
conscription.
That’s why jury service must me voluntary. Compulsory jury service is involuntary servitude – unconstitutional courtroom conscription.
ReplyDeleteWhat a hypocrite! When it comes to juries, you claim to hate involuntary servitude. But when it comes to hotels, cake bakers, and florists, you LOVE it.
Ever consider that taking an intellectually and morally consistent posture is a virtue, and that failing to do so is a clear sign of intellectual and moral bankruptcy?
Huh! You're conflating two vastly different situations. No one is forced to open his business to the public, but if one does so voluntarily, one must not discriminate. Public accommodations laws are constitutional. Forcing one to serve the government as a juror is not.
Delete