The rabid media mob, pundits, politicians and most Americans are
in a state of angry apoplexy over the “shocking verdict” in the San Francisco Kate
Steinle “murder” case where
a jury acquitted an “undocumented immigrant.”
Shocking verdict! Really? Well, no, of course not.
The defendant was grossly over charged, and the angry mob was
focused upon facts which had nothing whatever to do with his guilt or innocence.
This was not a murder or manslaughter case. There was virtually no evidence of violent
propensities, intent or motive to kill Kate Steinle.
Yes, the defendant, Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, was a criminal; a bad
egg; a homeless undocumented Mexican immigrant; a multi-convicted non-violent felon;
an alien in the U.S. illegally; deported previously five times, he shouldn’t
have been here but took advantage of San Francisco being a sanctuary city.
Now, I’m just as outraged as everyone else by these facts but they
certainly had nothing to do with any issue in the case involving this
defendant.
Prosecutors argued that Zarate intentionally shot Steinle as she
and her father walked on San Francisco's Pier 14. But his defense attorney showed
sufficient evidence of reasonable doubt. It was a freak accident he argued as the bullet ricocheted off the
ground and traveled about 80 feet before hitting the woman.
Was it intentional or accidental? That was the issue before the
jury. They ultimately sided with the defense. Why? Because of ample reasonable
doubt that he had intentionally taken Steinle's life. They did find him guilty
of being a felon in possession of a firearm because they were convinced beyond
a reasonable doubt of his guilt on that charge.
No reasonable jury would find an accused guilty of murder just
because he was an illegal alien. But President Donald Trump, like all the other
pissed off pundits, called the verdict "disgraceful." "No
wonder the people of our Country are so angry with Illegal Immigration,"
the President tweeted hours after the verdict… His exoneration is a
complete travesty of justice. BUILD THE WALL!”
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter said Steinle "would still
be alive if we had a wall," referring to the President's call
for the construction of a border wall between the US and Mexico.
Well, yes, it’s definitely a travesty; I’m for a wall and hate
sanctuary cities too, but no one can blame this jury verdict for something not
relevant to their lawful decision in the case. Obviously, the debate over
immigration didn't belong in the case. "Nothing about Mr. Garcia
Zarate's ethnicity, nothing about his immigration status, nothing about the
fact that he is born in Mexico had any relevance as to what happened on July 1,
2015," the public defender Francisco Ugarte said.
Shocking verdict! Really?
Don’t blame the jury.
Blame the Authority!
No comments:
Post a Comment