Statists love the government – they worship the state
– but they hate the Constitution, individual freedom, especially the Bill of
Rights. The hallmark of every statist is the attitude that they possess
authority to deprive individuals of their rights to due process of law and to take
private property for public use without just compensation.
The Fifth Amendment in the Bill of Rights constitutionally
prohibits the schemes of the statists. It specifically provides that: “No
person shall… be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of
law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just
compensation.”
Today, however, the statists controlling local governments
everywhere are telling individuals that they don’t enjoy the right to rent
their own property. They’re imposing restrictions on how and to whom
individuals can lease their own real estate and refusing to compensate property
owners for such unjust impositions.
Individuals are told by the statists that they can’t
rent, and if they can’t rent they can’t sell either, because prospective buyers
won’t buy what they can’t rent. This
leaves property owners deprived of their property rights without due process of
law and without reasonable compensation.
The statist lawmakers in Ojai California, for
example, have voted recently
to make all rentals for less than 30 days illegal. Similar unjust restrictions
have been imposed all over America from New York to San Francisco and several
Minnesota cities in-between.
Winona, Minnesota resident Ethan Dean owned a
three-bedroom home near Winona State University. While he was on his fourth
mission in Afghanistan between 2011 and 2012, he arranged to rent his home to
students of the university. “I started getting nasty notes from the
government while I was in Iraq,” he explained. “The notes were from the
city treasurer telling me that it was illegal to rent out my home. I had no
idea what they were talking about.”
The statists told him that they had imposed a
restriction on the number of homeowners who can rent out properties in specific
neighborhoods. They called it the “30 Percent Rule” -- allowing only 30
percent of homes in a neighborhood to be rentals. Dean’s block was 78 percent
rental properties when the ban was enacted, but his neighbor’s permits were
apparently grandfathered in. “They told me I had to kick the kids out of my
house, and if I didn’t, I’d be fined $450 a day,”
The restrictions prevented Dean from even selling
his home, as any time a potential homebuyer expressed interest, they quickly
backed out after learning the house was not rental-certified. “I couldn’t
rent it, and I couldn’t come back and live in it. I was in Afghanistan serving
our country.” He couldn’t keep up on his mortgage payments. So he lost his
home to foreclosure.
Statists take and don’t compensate.
Squire Taylor, you do not take this far enough. Rentals? Poof! The statists take in many more ways in precisely this manner: I have a client who has been trying to sell sand and gravel from their property for 13 years, and the state (well, actually, county) has been conspiring with the neighbors to prevent them from doing that. This is surely part and parcel with this measly rental business.
ReplyDelete