One can hardly blame Donald Trump for skipping the
recent Fox News Channel presidential debate in
favor of hosting an event to raise money for wounded military veterans. After
all, just like the first so-called Fox News “debate,” it really wasn’t a political
debate at all. It was just another show -- a circus performance for the purpose
of audience entertainment – not serious intellectual edification.
Once again ring master (moderator?), “Megyn Kelly
set the comedic tone for the evening: KELLY: “So let's get started… Senator
Cruz, before we get to the issues, let's address the elephant not in the room tonight.
(LAUGHTER) Donald Trump has chosen not to attend this evening's presidential
debate. What message do you think that sends to the voters of Iowa?”
That’s not a debate question. Kelly candidly
admits it has nothing whatsoever to do with the issues. It’s a deliberate
provocation directed at Donald Trump with whom she has been engaged in a feud
ever since the last Fox News debate wherein she deliberately provoked Trump
with stupid, juvenile, unprofessional questions having nothing to do with the
issues.
Megyn Kelly knows perfectly well why Trump
skipped this debate. He wasn’t sending a message to Iowa; far from it. She’s the reason. She doesn’t like Trump and the
feeling is mutual. She’s biased and she wears that bias on her sleeve. Kelly doesn’t
mind advertising it to the whole world. Her object is to scold and humiliate.
Remember, this is the same Megyn Kelly who confronted
Trump then with: “You’ve called women you don’t like ‘fat pigs,
dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals’... Your Twitter account has several
disparaging comments about women’s looks.”
Naturally, Kelly’s first non-question of the
latest “debate” gave Ted Cruz the perfect opportunity to mock his absent rival,
which is precisely what Kelly intended solely for the amusement of her audience
at Trump’s expense: CRUZ: “Now … let me say I'm a maniac and everyone on this stage is stupid, fat, and ugly. And Ben, you're a terrible surgeon." (LAUGHTER) "Now that we've gotten the Donald Trump portion out of the way...” (LAUGHTER) (APPLAUSE)
Ha, ha, ha, clap, clap, clap; that Megyn Kelly girl is just too
clever and amusing for words isn’t she? Look how she injected her jab against
Donald Trump right from the get go and the rest of the candidates on the “debate”
stage were reduced to being used as mere theatrical props in the Megyn Kelly
circus show. It’s all about her.
She proved that next by turning her knife on Ted Cruz with
another long, convoluted non-debate question designed to pit him personally against
Trump: KELLY: “The divide between you and Mr. Trump has turned into one of
the biggest stories in the country; And for six months that -- your campaign,
during this campaign, you praised Mr. Trump as somebody who you thought was an effective
voice against the Washington cartel. You said you were glad that he was running
as a Republican. But when he started to criticize you, your message changed,
and you suddenly started to portray him as the voice of the Washington cartel,
and suggested he would do the Democrats' bidding. Which is it?”
This question
wasn’t up for debate with the six other candidates on the stage. This wasn’t
about a serious political debate issue. It was solely directed at one candidate.
Kelly is not interested in moderating a debate in which the candidates’ debate one
another. She wants to participate. She wants the candidates to debate with HER!
She wants the spotlight on HER! She wants to shine.
Another
example: KELLY: “Senator [sic] Christie, you began this campaign
touting your record as a Republican from a blue state who knows how to get
things done and reach across the aisle. However, many Republicans feel that
reaching across the aisle and getting things done isn't great if you get the
wrong things done. And they prefer to stand on principle rather than
compromise. Why are they wrong and you're right?”
Ted Cruz
got it absolutely right when he observed: CRUZ: “Chris, I would note that… that the last four questions have been,
"Rand, please attack Ted. Marco, please attack Ted. Chris, please attack
Ted. Jeb, please attack Ted… Let me just say this...."
WALLACE: ... “It is a debate, sir.”
CRUZ: “... Well, no, no. A debate actually is a policy issue…”
You see,
that’s exactly the point. In a
presidential debate it’s the candidates who are supposed to make the debate
points – not the moderators – the candidates. It’s the moderator’s job to
moderate – not participate in the debate – moderate. They’re questions should
be short, precise and directed to all the candidates; for example: “If
elected, how would you handle ISIS?” “What would you do about gun violence?” ”What
would you do to improve the economy? ”What
do you think are the major threats to the homeland and how would you deal with
them?” They should begin the topic
and then let the candidates do the debating; let them score the political points;
let them bicker with each other. It’s not supposed to be an entertainment show.
It’s supposed to be a serious debate.
Never-mind
that, proclaims Megyn Kelly; she actually thinks that it is proper professional
form for her as a monitor to produce a campaign commercial, complete with video
clips, no less, targeting one candidate for the benefit of the others.
Case in
point: KELLY: “Live, in Des Moines,
Iowa. Now, we move onto the topic of immigration. Senator Rubio, we'll start
with you. When you ran for Senate in 2010, you made clear that you opposed
legalization and citizenship for illegal immigrants. You promised repeatedly
that you would oppose it as a U.S. Senator as well. Here are just a few
examples. Watch:” (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) … (END VIDEO CLIP) … (BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP) … (END VIDEO CLIP) … (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) … (END VIDEO CLIP)
The video
clips purport to show Rubio flip-flopping on the immigration issue. Taken together
it looks just like a 60 second negative campaign commercial) KELLY: “Within
two years of getting elected you were co-sponsoring legislation to create a
path to citizenship, in your words, amnesty. Haven't you already proven that
you cannot be trusted on this issue?”
And on
and on … WALLACE: “Gentlemen, we're going to turn now to what we call
electability, issues that you're either facing in the primaries or issues that
you're certainly going to face in a general election. So you may not be
altogether unhappy if you're not included in this round.” (LAUGHTER) “Senator
Cruz, you pride yourself on standing up to the D.C. cartel, but as we've seen
to a certain degree tonight, there's a price for standing up to the D.C.
cartel. Thirteen
Republican senators have endorsed other candidates, none have endorsed you.
You -- twice last year, you asked for a colleague to second a motion, a routine
courtesy on the Senate floor, and no senator would do it. Top GOP officials worry
that if you're at the top of the ticket -- some officials -- that not only will
you lose the White House, but it will tank the ticket all the way down the
line. The question is does your style sometimes get in the way of your ability
to get things done, sir?”
The 7th
GOP presidential Debate: Another Fox News Circus.
No comments:
Post a Comment