School administrators and teachers in Batavia, Illinois apparently
think it is perfectly OK to require students at the local high school to possibly
incriminate themselves by answering in writing, with their names printed at the
top, a list of survey questions about, among other things, their private
emotions together with their use of alcohol, tobacco and drugs during their
free time.
In short, these statist compulsory education government goons
are systematically violating the federal constitutional rights of students by
asking them to reveal private, personal and potentially incriminating information
which is none of the school district’s god damned business.
District Superintendent, Jack Barshinger justifies the practice
by claiming it is supported by local teachers as a way to stem an increase in
student suicides, since many of them reported not being able to tell when a
student was having emotional problems.
He insists that the information would not be shared with
the police; the answers would be reviewed by social workers, school counselors and
psychologists. “We can’t help them if we aren’t aware of their needs,” said
Barshinger.
But the proper mission of a public school district, which
compels children and parents by law to participate in the system, is to provide
its young students with a basic education, not to snoop around into their
intimate private emotions and invade their personal privacy by violating their
First and Fifth Amendment rights.
John Dryden, a social studies instructor at the school,
seeing the situation for what it was, took it upon himself to do the right
thing by advising students
of their right not to incriminate themselves before giving them the survey questions
list which had each student’s name printed on it. “I made a judgment call,” he explained.
“There was no time to ask anyone.”
This is one teacher who really was looking out for his
kids.
But for that he now faces disciplinary action and a black
mark in his employment record from the school district which thinks that the
children under its jurisdiction have no constitutional rights or that even if
they do, such rights may be violated with impunity.
So advising children of their constitutional rights is
not considered part of the learning experience in school districts practicing compulsory education by self
incrimination.
Ironic, isn't it, that the teachers who could not recognize a student with a sever emotional problem, expect (someone?) their customers to believe that this deficiency can be overcome with a survey?
ReplyDeleteHow can youpay these fools to teach your kids anything?
A few years ago, the son (about 12 years old) of a friend came home with a survey with the questions you identified on it, only about half the questions were about the parent's activities, possessions and beliefs.
I guess things have gone further down the slide in this part of the country.
Rule #1 when confronted by 'authority' - SHUT UP.
Rule #2: don't tell them anything.
Rule #3: TBD
Rich
Some parents act as if the responsibility to educate, and even care for their child, is primarily the responsibility of the public school system.
ReplyDeletethe best proofreading and editing.