I don’t agree with the
death penalty for many reasons, but mostly because the way it is administered
in America is just far too haphazard, arbitrary, unwieldy and costly to qualify
the practice as worthwhile.
In the state of Texas,
for example, more executions are carried out than just about anywhere else in
the United States, but strange as it may seem, the law requires that such prisoners
have to be fit to be fried.
Fit, as in mentally fit,
that is. A Texas appeals court
ruled this week that a schizophrenic death row inmate cannot be forced to take
medication which could make him mentally fit to be executed.
The convict, who has
spent 22 years on death row, was sentenced to die in for his role in a 1989
armed robbery that left a restaurant manager dead. He had originally been scheduled
for execution in 2006, but won a reprieve when he was found to be mentally
incompetent.
Then prosecutors sought
permission to have him “involuntarily medicated” which would render him
fit. After a lengthy and hugely expensive legal battle the convict was force
fed drugs which brought the worst of his symptoms under control. So he was
found by a lower court to be mentally competent to be executed in 2012.
But an appellate court
overruled that decision, holding that the lower court lacked the authority to
order forced medication. “We hold that the evidence conclusively shows that
appellant’s competency to be executed was achieved solely through the
involuntary medication, which the trial court had no authority to order,”
said the court. “The evidence conclusively shows that (the) appellant is
incompetent to be executed.”
The US Supreme Court has
ruled that mentally incompetent inmates cannot be executed but has not yet
considered whether forcible medication is permissible in order to render an
inmate mentally fit.
So the law is apparently
settled that mental incompetency is grounds for a reprieve from the death
penalty. One must be mentally competent before one can be officially rendered
eternally mentally incompetent via execution.
This lucky prisoner was
ruled mentally incompetent to be rendered mentally incompetent.
Because only in America must
a death row inmate be fit to be fried.
Please clarify. Do you think it is a good thing to kill someone who is so incompetent that he doesn't know what is happening? Thanks.
ReplyDeleteNo, I don't think it's a good idea to kill anyone whether mentally incompetent or not and I don't think the issue of competence should have anything to do with it.
ReplyDelete