A
House of Representatives stenographer
was dragged off the floor last week when she took the dais to deliver an unscheduled
religious rant. "Praise be to God Jesus Christ… Thus spoke the Lord… This
is not the Lord's work,” she proclaimed, along with other similar
statements.
"I
hammered to get control and hush her up. She said something about the devil. It
was sudden, confusing and heartbreaking. She is normally a gentle soul," explained Congresswoman
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., the presiding officer, who banged the gavel to
restore order several times.
The disruption stunned members of Congress and U.S.
Capitol Police took the woman to a local hospital for a mental health
evaluation.
I
guess they thought she was crazy and suffering a mental breakdown, but I really
can’t understand exactly why as these same members of Congress employ a paid professional
religious chaplain to get up in front of them in the same spot every single day
to babble on about exactly the same kind of nonsense.
How
is it that they can sincerely believe that this woman is crazy, or at least
unreasonable, while on the other hand they believe that their Christian chaplain
is perfectly reasonable and of sound mind?
This
question brings me to comment here on the article by Kevin Vallier referenced in
RRND last week entitled: “Christian Belief is
Reasonable, So Respect It.” He
makes an argument as best he can that theism, revealed religion, the Gospel
stories, the Holy Trinity, and thus the whole body of Christianity are all reasonable,
sound and rational beliefs which deserve far more respect from intellectuals
than they presently enjoy.
As
a libertarian, let me acknowledge that I respect the rights of all people to
believe anything they like, including any religion, as long as they don’t
employ their beliefs to interfere with the rights of others. I think that
perfectly reasonable people can often entertain perfectly unreasonable beliefs,
that is to say: beliefs which do not rest upon a firm intellectual foundation
of reason.
So
while most Christians are indeed reasonable people, the truth about Christianity
and all other theistic religions is this:
No,
it is not reasonable.
It
is not reasonable because it specifically rejects reason and the realities of
existence again and again as the foundation for human existence, morality and
behavior. Theistic religions, including Christianity, are culturally premeditated
assaults upon reason. The relentless calls for self denial and sacrifice are
wholly irrational, grounded entirely upon an imaginary conceptualized
abstraction, and conceived by cunning men for the benefit of their own
parasitical human Authority!
The
first moral lesson in the Old Testament book of Genesis has God warning Adam and
Eve against eating the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. The use of
individual consciousness, i.e., reason to discern morality is considered evil
and sinful in the Bible – the original sin – against God’s Authority!
From
that point on the Bible stories relentlessly assault the concept of human
reason and logic as the means by which we should live our lives. Christianity especially
demands that men and women live by faith alone. To accomplish that an otherwise
reasonable human must be willing to deliberately suspend reason, ignore reality
and even sacrifice themselves if called upon to do so by the Authority!
“A scorner seeks wisdom, and
finds it not, but knowledge is easy to him that understands; Ways which seem
right to man are the ways of death.” Prov. 14:6
“And immediately when Jesus
perceived in his spirit that they so reasoned within themselves, [as to why it seemed to them that he was committing blasphemies
for claiming the ability to forgive sins] he said unto them, Why reason ye
these things in your hearts?” Mark 2:8
“I beseech you therefore,
brethren, by the mercies of God,” preached the
Apostle Paul “that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy,
acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. And be not conformed to
this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may
prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.” Romans
12:1-2
“This I say therefore, and
testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the
vanity of their mind, Having the
understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the
ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:” Paul: Ephesians 4:17-18
“Beware of dogs, beware of evil
workers, beware of the concision; for we are the circumcision, which
worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence
in the flesh.” Paul: Philippians 3:2-3
Vallier maintains that a reasonable, rational and
well-informed person can believe in a revealed religion, which includes belief
in a divinely inspired set of social practices and sacred texts such as the
above, and I agree with him, because reasonable people can often be found to believe
in unreasonable ideas and concepts.
So
yes, a reasonable person can be a theist, believe in the Gospels and the Holy
Trinity, but it does not follow logically that Christian theism, a concept
which is entirely imaginary, is based upon reason.
No,
it is not reasonable.
The hypocrites called on their own beliefs, prove again just how deep the hypocrisy goes. That there is a Congressional Chaplain is clearly unconstitutional.
ReplyDelete