NSA
whistleblower and genuine American hero Edward Snowden has been vindicated.
I’ve
been patiently waiting for this to happen and now it has.
This week a Federal
District Judge ruled that the National Security Agency's Orwellian style metadata
surveillance program that collects millions of Americans' telephone records is probably
unconstitutional because it violates
the Fourth Amendment.
U.S.
District Court Judge Richard Leon issued a preliminary injunction against the
program but suspended the order to allow an appeal by the Justice Department. NSA’s
spying tactics are unlawful, he found, but he’ll leave the ultimate decision on
that point to the Appellate Courts.
"The court concludes that plaintiffs have standing
to challenge the constitutionality of the government's bulk collection and
querying of phone record metadata, that they have demonstrated a substantial
likelihood of success on the merits of their Fourth Amendment claim (of
unlawful search and seizure), and that they will suffer irreparable harm
absent…relief,''
Leon wrote.
The
government: "does not cite a single instance in which analysis of the
NSA's bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack,'' he
concluded.” Given the limited record before me at this point in the
litigation — most notably the utter lack of evidence that a terrorist attack
has ever been prevented because searching the NSA database was faster than
other investigative tactics — I have serious doubts about the efficacy of the
metadata collection program as a means of conducting time-sensitive
investigations in cases involving imminent threats of terrorism.''
Of
course, the powers that be in the government of the United Statists of America
will certainly appeal this decision, and the case will likely find its way to
the U.S. Supreme Court. But even if the decision is overturned, (which in my
humble opinion is likely), Edward Snowden, far from being a traitor as
portrayed by the Authority, has been vindicated and will go down in
history as a hero and martyr for honorably serving his country.
Leon’s
ruling is the first among many to be decided in the near future regarding the
legality of several aspects of the NSA’s spying program on American citizens. "Today,
a secret program authorized by a secret court was, when exposed to the light of
day, found to violate Americans' rights. It is the first of many," said
Snowden in a statement responding to the court decision.
National
security considerations do not trump the Fourth Amendment of the United States
Constitution. Snowden knew that when he blew the whistle on his NSA bosses in
violation of his oath to keep its secrets because he was upholding a higher
oath to the Constitution and the people of the United States. That’s why he is
not a traitor and that’s why historians will not paint him as a traitor.
Now
Snowden has written an "open letter to the people of Brazil"
offering to help their government investigate allegations of U.S. spying on
their nation. In return for this valuable service he wants only a grant of permanent
political asylum
in Brazil.
"I've expressed my willingness to assist where it's
appropriate and legal, but, unfortunately, the U.S. government has been working
hard to limit my ability to do so," says the letter. "Until a country
grants me permanent political asylum, the U.S. government will continue to
interfere with my ability to speak out… Six months ago, I revealed that the NSA
wanted to listen to the whole world. Now, the whole world is listening back,
and speaking out, too. And the NSA doesn't like what its hearing."
Edward Snowden has been
vindicated and deserves to get his wish.
I'm now giving odds on a "higher" court overturning this (and if they don't, the other branches will adjust the process enough to paper over the "problems"). The courts have shown they will not stop the growth of the state. They are as much part of the state, and part of the problem, as the rest of the state.
ReplyDeleteand...don't need no stinkin court to "vindicate" truth...
ReplyDelete