As
a committed libertarian minded American, I take the Bill of Rights and its constitutional
guarantees against any government interference with individual liberty
seriously. There are no constitutional exceptions to each of those guarantees.
As far as I’m concerned then they are written in stone. They might be altered
but only buy constitutional amendment which entails a lengthy and cumbersome procedure.
That’s
what the founding fathers intended as the way to make the United States of
America uniquely different than the governments of most other nations,
particularly the nation of Great Britain and its tyrannical king, with whom we
rebelled against and fought the Revolutionary War.
But
Republicans, Democrats, and other myriad forms of statist thinkers, including many
of the supposedly apolitical members of the federal and state judiciaries –
yes, and even most Americans for that matter -- don’t exactly see it the same as
I do. They believe it’s perfectly OK for
the state to carve out exceptions by fiat to our otherwise most precious guaranteed
liberties.
It’s
OK, for example, to infringe upon our constitutional rights as long as the infringements
are “reasonable” they reckon. Never-mind that there are no constitutional
exceptions to the First Amendment, for instance; they simply invent them and
then justify the infringements on the grounds that the state has a “reasonable”
compelling interest to do so.
In
Britain recently there are two parents who face prison
time for taking their children out of school for only a week to go on a special
holiday vacation abroad. It was the first holiday the family had enjoyed
together in five years. Upon their return from the Greek island of Rhodes,
school officials dunned them with a fine of £360 (about $600), which they
failed to pay, so now it’s jail time.
Regular
attendance is paramount to a child’s educational experience and benefits the
overall school community, reasons the British government. The benefit to the
community outweighs the liberties of individuals; therefore they deem what
these parents decided on for the benefit of their family a crime against the
state.
Think
again if you don’t believe that this kind of mindless government tyranny can’t
happen in America where the Bill of Rights supposedly guarantees our individual
liberty. Every jurisdiction in the United States of America has long ago passed
compulsory education laws requiring parents and children to submit to the state’s
“reasonable” interest in compelling attendance at school.
And
there is a long line of precedent in the state and federal courts, including
the United States Supreme Court, upholding compulsory school attendance laws as
“reasonable” infringements of otherwise enforceable constitutional rights. “There
is no doubt as to the power of a State, having a high responsibility for
education of its citizens, to impose reasonable regulations for the control and
duration of basic education,” declared
SCOTUS unanimously in 1972.
But
just how is it that there is no doubt?
The
court never answers that question. No court ever has. The justices just blithely
take it for granted that the state may compel school attendance in most
situations as against individual liberty interests if such infringements are
deemed “reasonable” despite the plain fact that there are no such “reasonableness”
constitutional exceptions to the clear mandates of the Bill of Rights.
The
sad fact is that American statists can legally make all parents and children
education slaves by criminalizing non-compliance. These statists insist that a
supposedly free people are not truly free, but instead owe certain individual obligations
and responsibilities to the state even though the Constitution sets forth no
such obligations or responsibilities.
The
courts have used exactly the same statist reasoning with regard to many other
laws, including compulsory military draft and conscription laws, tax laws, even
ObamaCare laws. The state can make you its slave as long as it can convince the
judges that it’s “reasonable.”
That’s
why in America, as in Britain, and elsewhere, the Bill of Rights does not exist
if the government wants to “reasonably” make you a compulsory education, or any
other kind of slave.
Another example of why the courts are not protectors of liberty.
ReplyDelete"by" not "buy"
ReplyDelete