What
if there was a law that made it illegal to remove a bullet from the body of a
gunshot victim, or a knife from the body of a stabbing victim, or flushing
poison from the body of a poisoning victim, because such would amount to
unlawful tampering with evidence?
The
gunshot victim would be required by law to keep the bullet lodged in his body
until after the trial of the shooter in order to “preserve” the evidence of the
crime. Failure to abide by this law would render the victim a criminal felon himself
just as much so as his assailant.
Likewise,
the stabbing and poisoning victims would be equally obligated by statute to
keep the knife sticking in his body, or the poison in his blood stream, until their
assailants could be tried for the crime. “Tampering” with the evidence by
pulling out the knife of flushing out the poison would make the victim a
criminal.
What
if the justification for such a law was to protect shooting, stabbing and
poisoning victims from assailants by properly preserving the evidence of the
crimes for trial?
The very idea is absurd, isn’t it? No sane lawmaker would
even dream of passing such a law right? It would be a law that victimizes the
victim.
Well,
there are a lot of insane lawmakers out there and one of them, a Republican statist
from the State of New Mexico, has proposed just such a law.
No, it doesn’t
victimize gunshot, stabbing or poisoning victims, but it’s equally stupid, insane
and egregious as it would victimize the victims of rape or incest.
That’s
right. A law, proposed
by state Rep. Cathrynn Brown (R) makes it illegal and criminal for the innocent
victim of incest or a rapist to get an abortion on the grounds that doing so
would constitute “tampering with evidence” in the suspect’s trial.
So
the unfortunate victim of the crime of rape or incest who happened to get
pregnant would be compelled by this law to carry her pregnancy to term.
Failure
on her part to do so would render her a criminal – guilty of a third degree
felony. And anyone who assisted her in getting an abortion would also be guilty
of a felony punishable by up to three years in prison.
“New
Mexico needs to strengthen its laws to deter sex offenders,”
explained Brown with a straight face. “By adding this law in New Mexico, we can
help to protect women across our state.”
I
don’t think Rep. Brown is as much concerned with protecting rape and incest
victims, however, as she is with justifying the passage of an anti-abortion
law. She obviously couldn’t care less about the lives of crime victims.
So in
her insane and dogged pursuit of a statist right wing religiously oriented
anti-abortion agenda, she’s very quick to proclaim:
“Let’s victimize the victim.”
This is completely consistent. All state enforced criminal punishments victimize the victims. The state prosocutes crime because criminals attack "society", but all the victims have to pay for the criminal's punishment.
ReplyDelete