I respect Buzz Aldrin. He, and Neil Armstrong, the first
human beings to ever walk upon the surface of the Moon, were brave men. After
all, there was a likely possibility that they would never come back from that
mission, that they would perish 240,000 miles away from planet Earth.
The American funded NASA Apollo Moon program, conducted during
the late 1960’s, culminating in landing men on the Moon, was costly, difficult
and exceedingly dangerous. As Mr. Aldrin
explains,
“First of all, what got us there was the tireless effort of some 400,000
people who shared a universal dream.”
Yes, it was all of that together with many $billions of
dollars in taxpayer money, which Mr. Aldrin neglects to mention. And just what
exactly did we American taxpayers get, (aside from bragging rights), for all that
effort and all those $billions of dollars?
Aldrin candidly answers that question: “Back in July
1969, I stood on the talcum-like lunar dust just a few feet from our home away
from home, Eagle, the lunar module that transported Neil Armstrong and me to
the bleak, crater-pocked moonscape…. Standing there and soaking in the view, I
called it as I saw it: "magnificent desolation."’
“As Neil and I walked upon the surface of the
moon at Tranquility Base, we satisfied a vision held by humankind for
centuries,” Aldrin added. “And as inscribed on the
plaque fastened to the ladder of our lander: "We Came in Peace for All
Mankind."’
So the short answer to the compelling question is:
Nothing!
No gold; no silver; no
fertile land; no abundant resources whatsoever; nothing at all of any tangible value;
only a big sphere of dust and rocks; and some pretty pictures of "magnificent
desolation," plus a “feeling of awe” at the fact that we satisfied “a vision held
by humankind for centuries” to put a man on the moon.
“America's
triumph was viewed as a success for all humankind,” Aldrin exudes. “People
expressed their collective pride by declaring ‘We did it!’ -- There was an aura
of ownership of the achievement.’”
Yes we did it. That
was 45 years ago and the average American taxpayer has still received no
tangible benefit from spending $billions of dollars to put human beings on the
surface of the Moon for a few hours so that they could hop around in the low
gravity environment, hit a few golf balls, and marvel at the lovely view of mother
Earth way out there in the black endless vacuum of space.
“Standing on that harsh, desolate, yet
magnificent terrain, stealing precious moments, I looked back at Earth.
Everything I knew and loved lay suspended on a far away and fragile blue sphere
that was engulfed by the blackness of space.” says Aldrin. “I
couldn't have imagined anything more desolate -- knowing it hadn't changed in
hundreds of thousands of years. You couldn't find any place like that on Earth.
The airlessness; Brilliant sunlight illuminated the dust, which was everywhere.”
That’s right, Buzz. Aside from the pretty view, there is
really nothing at all to love on the surface of the Moon. There’s no
atmosphere, no oxygen, no water, no plants, animals -- nothing that we all know
and love here on Earth. You see, the fact is that human beings are not adapted to
live on the Moon. In order to live on the Moon we’d have to first bring all the
things that we need to survive from the Earth.
Despite that costly lesson in economics, and unnecessary exercise
in hubris, Buzz Aldrin now says that we American taxpayers should be doing
exactly the same thing, only this time by sending a bunch of human beings to
the surface of Mars. Of course, it’s easy for him to say. The $billions won’t
be coming out of his pocket.
“For America, another destination is calling,”
declares
Aldrin. America's longer-term goal
should be permanent human presence on Mars… The moment to begin could be on the
occasion of the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11's touchdown on the moon… We can
make a courageous, Kennedyesque commitment to America's future in deep space.
The U.S. President could utter these momentous words: '‘I believe this nation
should commit itself, within two decades, to commencing an America-led,
permanent presence on the planet Mars.’"
I say: Why?
Not once does Mr. Aldrin explain exactly what the average
American taxpayer will get – how we will benefit, that is -- from the folly of
sending human beings to the surface of Mars, another desolate orb in space just
like the Moon.
He’s calling for us to put up the “funding,” but
not bothering to mention the tangible payoff justifying the enormous
investment.
Buzz Aldrin walked on the Moon and we still have nothing tangible
to show for it aside from a few pleasant nostalgic memories of American space
cadets on the Moon.
Now he’s mooning over Mars.
Normally, I find myself in agreement with you but this time I don't. To begin with the moon has rare earth elements, iron ore and titanium. They have brought back several pounds of moon dust and found that earth plants like corn, wheat and soybeans grows very well in it.
ReplyDeleteSecondly as time goes by and I see the incompetent leadership all over the world it become more and more apparent to me that sooner or later one of them is going to fire missiles into another country and start WW3. If we stay here on earth there is a very good chance that the mankind is going become extinct and that is the main reason that we not only need to establish colonies on the moon but also on as many worlds as we can.
Of all the wasteful things my wealth is confiscated for, this is the least offensive. There is more to value than what can be traded. Was the Sistine Chapel a waste of resources? Voyaging to the bottom of the ocean? Breaking the sound barrier? Discovering the Higgs Boson? I agree that it would be better if these things, and going to the moon, were achieved without the thieving hands of the state, but maybe the fact that nobody directly profitted from the achievement (even though there was plenty of indirect profitting) somehow makes it less offensive.
ReplyDelete