IMPLICATIONS OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE REALITY OF EXISTENCE
Conventional collectivist created authority is a deception in consciousness. You are your own Authority!
Sunday, December 14, 2014
If Enhanced Interrogation is not Torture...
My last post discussed the reasons why, in my
opinion,Bush & Chaney
Should Be Behind Barstoday for
the crimes they committed against captured suspected terrorist detainees
following the infamous World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks of September 11,
2001. They’re the culprits who authorized the CIA to conduct a top secret program
involving so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” for the purpose of
gleaning information from the captives.
In short, according to the recently released Senate
report concerning the matter, President George W. Bush and his Vice President
Dick Chaney illegally authorized the U.S. government to abuse and torture
Oh, no they didn’t! scream the many pundits and
politicians who defend the use of enhanced interrogation procedures on
prisoners. First of all, they insist that the enhanced interrogation techniques
carried out by the CIA, which included, among many other brutal practices, water
boarding, for example, is not torture. Enhanced interrogation is legal, they
say; it’s necessary; it saved many lives; it’s effective; and it works.
In the same breath, however, these defenders of
enhanced interrogation uniformly maintain that the Senate should not have released
the report about it. Because that report is going to seriously endanger the
lives of Americans, they warn. It’s going to make America look bad in the eyes
of the rest of the world. It’s going to cause our enemies to become even angrier
at Americans and thereby increase the likelihood of more terror attacks. And,
oh yes, we’re not going to do it anymore?
But if the enhanced interrogation techniques, which
were authorized by Bush and Chaney, and carried out by the CIA upon captive
suspects in the so called War on Terror, is not torture... then intentional
infliction of physical pain and suffering upon a person by the authorities for
the purpose of coercion, i.e., to extract vital information or a confession, for example, is
not torture, a conclusion which flies in the face of the very definition of the
word “torture.” Calling torture “enhanced interrogation” is simply calling
torture by another name.
To be sure, the enhanced interrogation methods
employed by the CIA and authorized by Bush and Chaney consisted of a lot more
than simply the interrogators raising their voice during the questioning. It
was a lot more than subjecting them to the 3rd degree as it were. It
was punching and slapping them; throwing them against concrete walls; drowning
them to near death; and in some cases even killing them. I’ll spare you the
rest of the gory details which you can read for yourself in the report.
If all of that is not torture...
What then is the law that allows it? The defenders
never cite any law.
Why isn’t it lawful and proper to conduct the same
enhanced interrogation methods on domestic criminal suspects? If the cops want
to know who the accomplices of a kidnapping or bank robber suspect are, for
example, why not employ a few enhanced interrogation methods on the detainee to
get that important information by coercion? It’s legal; it’s necessary; it
saves lives; it’s effective; and it works, doesn’t it?
Why can’t we Americans use enhanced interrogation
methods as a lawful and proper means to discipline our children? After all, it’s
not torture, right? Isn’t it perfectly OK to use a little physical pain and suffering
to make our kids better citizens if it works? Spare the rod and spoil the
child, right? That’s what the Bible says.
Why didn’t Americans use the exact same enhanced
interrogation methods on the German and Japanese prisoners of war during WWII? If
such methods are lawful and proper, shouldn’t it have been routinely done
during that horrible war when our country truly was in dire danger? The Japs and
the Germans were using it on Americans. Why didn’t we do it to them?
Why does Senator John McCain, who suffered terribly from
the same kind of enhanced interrogation methods as a POW at the hands of our
Viet Cong enemies during the Vietnam War call it torture if it’s not torture?
If anyone should know what torture is its John McCain and he calls what Bush
and Chaney authorized torture, plain and simple.
If it’s not torture, then why do the defenders argue
that the report about it should not have been released? Why should it endanger
American lives any more than our lives are endangered now unless it reveals
something about our government that is really bad; something for which all
Americans should be ashamed?
If it’s not torture, then why should the report make
America look bad in the eyes of world opinion? Why should it make our enemies
angrier at us than they already are? Why are we not going to do it anymore if it’s
not torture? What’s the problem if it
didn’t reveal that laws were violated and our nation should be ashamed?
Obviously, there is no reason for the defenders to
be alarmed if indeed enhanced interrogation is not torture.