I’ve been an admirer of
the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) for 50 years; was once a card
carrying member; and still believe that it’s a fine organization dedicated to
the critically important cause of preserving the Bill of Rights and personal constitutional
liberty for all Americans.
The ACLU by my reckoning
during the last half century has been mostly correct in its assessment and
actions on controversial issues of the day concerning civil and constitutional
rights, even though the organization of late seems dominated by far too many
left wing ideologues.
Sometimes when it comes
to civil liberties, these far left ideologues predictably get it horribly
wrong. That’s what I learned once again today when I received this “urgent” ACLU
Action email entitled:
“We can't let what happened to Trayvon Martin
happen again
Dear Timothy,
When I learned that George Zimmerman
was found ‘not guilty’ for the murder of Trayvon Martin, my heart immediately
went out to his mother.
Trayvon's mother is living my worst
fear—of what can happen to my own 23-year-old black son because of the color of
his skin.
I've had to teach my son how his
racial identity can be an invitation to scorn and mistreatment. I even
announced his return from boarding school to neighbors once, to be safe:
"Don't be alarmed if you see a black kid walking around; he's my son and
he lives here."
From being stopped in the streets
without cause to the way police handle cases—for the accused and for victims
like Trayvon—countless Americans are racially profiled every day.
Racial profiling violates our
Constitution and American values—and sends dangerous signals to people like
George Zimmerman. If we're to prevent more tragedies like Trayvon, we must
tackle the racial bias that undermines our justice system.
The End Racial Profiling Act,
currently in Congress, would help make clear that people should be judged by
what they do, not the color of their skin.
Please sign the petition now urging
Congress to pass the End Racial Profiling Act and put a stop to racial bias in
law enforcement.
Here's just some of what the End
Racial Profiling Act would do to clean up our justice system:
·
Prohibit
racial profiling in law enforcement, backed by a private right of action.
·
Mandate
law enforcement training on racial profiling, as well as data collection.
·
Make
law enforcement funding contingent on effective policies that prohibit
profiling.
The Zimmerman verdict has sparked a
national conversation—now we need to turn that into action. Because unless
Americans work together to end the practice of racial profiling, the
precautions I and many other parents of color take will never be enough.
Please sign the petition now urging
Congress to pass the End Racial Profiling Act.
As Americans try to make sense of
the Zimmerman verdict and people ask what “justice” really means for people of
color in our system, I feel that we must use this opportunity to acknowledge
the real ways that racial bias plays out in society.
Passing a law to eradicate racial
profiling from law enforcement would be a step towards creating a more just
justice system.
If we're to prevent more tragedies
like Trayvon, we must tackle the racial bias that undermines our justice
system. Urge Congress to pass the End Racial Profiling Act.
ACT
NOW
Thank you,
Laura Murphy for the ACLU Action
team”
Oh, please!
This is the largest wagonload
of bullshit I’ve heard about in months!
Did this misguided woman
not pay the slightest bit of attention to the actual evidence produced at
George Zimmerman’s trial?
Clearly she did not.
From what I know in a nutshell
about that evidence it is apparent that Zimmerman, a self appointed
neighborhood watchman, was following Martin that night because there had been a
series of burglaries in the vicinity and he was suspicious that Martin might be
a burglar.
When Martin discovered
that he was being followed he called his girlfriend complaining that a “white
assed cracker” was following him. Then Martin angrily confronted Zimmerman, jumped
him, and while on top of him punched his face repeatedly, breaking his nose,
and pounded his head against the pavement causing bloody injuries.
Zimmerman, fearing for
his life, while flat on his back with Martin on top of him pinning him down and
beating on him, screamed for help and finally pulled out his gun to shoot
Martin. Unfortunately for Martin, he died.
This was not a murder
beyond a reasonable doubt. This was not manslaughter beyond a reasonable doubt.
The evidence just didn’t come close to supporting those charges. This was a
classic case of self defense. Racial profiling had absolutely nothing to do
with what happened to Martin, except for the fact that it was he who was
racially profiling Zimmerman as a “white assed cracker.” The only evidence of
racial bias was in Martin’s mind.
In short, Trayvon Martin
wasn’t murdered. He was shot by Zimmerman in self defense. So the jury verdict
of not guilty was wholly proper and in accordance with the evidence.
This incident did not
involve law enforcement engaging in racial profiling, far from it, but even if
it did, if race is part of the profile of a criminal who has been committing
crimes, there is certainly nothing wrong with making an assessment as to
whether a particular individual under suspicion fits that profile.
There is nothing wrong
with profiling suspects as long as the motive is not based solely upon the suspect’s
race. If a suspect fits the profile of what witnesses have described as the
person who committed a crime it is perfectly proper to employ that profile to
search for the criminal.
So I cannot help but
say: ACLU: Shame on you!
-----
ReplyDeleteMartin angrily confronted Zimmerman, jumped him, and while on top of him punched his face repeatedly, breaking his nose, and pounded his head against the pavement causing bloody injuries.
Zimmerman, fearing for his life, while flat on his back with Martin on top of him pinning him down and beating on him, screamed for help and finally pulled out his gun to shoot Martin.
-----
Maybe, maybe not. A maximum of two people knew exactly what happened that night. One of them is dead, and the other one's version may or may not be true. "Reasonable doubt" that Zimmerman's story is false is not the same thing as proof that it is true.
Of course we don't know for certain what is true or not, but the credible evidence which was introduced at the trial clearly supported Zimmerman's version of the events -- not the theory of the prosecution. Add it all up and the reasonable doubt of Zimmerman's guilt was overwhelming. A conviction of either second degree murder or manslaughter under that evidence would have resulted in a travesty of justice.
DeleteNow the only problem is the delusion that the judicial system is interested in justice.
Delete