Republican presidential candidate hopefuls are one
after the other stupidly sabotaging their otherwise excellent chances of helping
the Party win back the executive office by steadfastly keeping to their statist
ways, and attempting to stifle the rising voices of reason within the ranks.
New Jersey GOP governor, Chris Christie, for example, is
proving to be no exception. He’s now showing off his true statist politician U.S.
government authoritarian colors -- another candidate who is no friend of liberty -- by taking a peremptory shot at Sen. Rand Paul and the libertarian
wing of his Party.
Christie, and many others of his ilk, are falling all
over themselves lately trying to support and justify the National Security
Agency's (NSA) massive unconstitutional surveillance programs directed against
innocent American citizens. They’re the ones who’ve been screaming for the
blood of Edward Snowden for having the courage and integrity to expose his own
government’s wrongdoing.
During a panel discussion in Colorado recently, hosted
by the Republican Governors Association, he excoriated what he calls the "strain
of libertarianism that’s going through both parties," suggesting that
people like Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky explain their positions to families
of September 11 victims.
“As a former prosecutor who was appointed by President
George W. Bush on Sept. 10, 2001, I just want us to be really cautious, because
this strain of libertarianism that’s going through both parties right now and
making big headlines, I think, is a very dangerous thought,” Christie declared. “You can name any one of them that’s engaged in
this … I want them to come to New Jersey and sit across from the widows and the
orphans and have that conversation. … I’m very nervous about the direction this
is moving in.”
In other words, Christie is unabashedly saying that the
September 11, 2001 terror attack and the subsequent War on Terrorism justifies
the federal government in trashing the entire Bill of Rights for all Americans;
that those proponents of liberty, such as Sen. Paul and many others, have no
right to complain.
Like all the other statist politicians in America,
Christie deems libertarian concerns over our loss of freedoms and privacy as "esoteric."
“President Obama has done nothing to change the policies of the Bush administration
in the war on terrorism. And I mean practically nothing,” says Christie. “And
you know why? Cause they work.”
“If Governor Christie believes the constitutional
rights and the privacy of all Americans is ‘esoteric,’ he either needs a new
dictionary or he needs to talk to more Americans, because a great number of
them are concerned about the dramatic overreach of our government in recent
years,” a senior adviser to Sen. Paul retorted. Fighting
terrorism "can and must be done in keeping with our Constitution"
“Chris Christie thinks freedom is dangerous. What's
dangerous is a foreign policy that borrows from China to pay people who burn
our flag in Egypt,” Sen. Paul remarked
in a Facebook post, in which he called Christie: “Obama’s favorite
Republican,” and wondered if he also approves of sending weapons to “al
Qaeda allies” in Syria.
“Christie worries
about the dangers of freedom. I worry about the danger of losing that freedom,” read a post
on Paul’s official Twitter account. “Spying without warrants is
unconstitutional."
Rep. Peter King (R) of New York, a former chairman of
the Homeland Security Committee and another veteran statist foreign policy
hawk, said he “isn’t saying no” to a potential presidential run in part
because “when I see people like Rand Paul talking about drones killing
people out to get a cup of coffee, I don't want that to be the face of the
national Republican Party."
On the bright side, the House
took up an amendment to the bill funding the Department of Defense from Rep.
Justin Amash (R) of Michigan, a House libertarian. His amendment would have
defunded a National Security Agency program started in the Bush administration
that collects Americans’ phone records. Though it failed, a total of 94
Republicans, joined by a majority of Democrats, deemed the “wing nut
coalition” by House statist war hawks, voted against them and for the bill.
Libertarians might be
dismissively called the “wing nut coalition” by statist war mongers and
lovers of authoritarian government like Peter King and Chris Christie, but make
no mistake about it; the voices of dissent against the tide of unconstitutional
government conduct in America are growing and the politicians are starting to
show their true colors.
GOP Gov. Chris Christie, for one,
is clearly no friend of liberty.
This is great!
ReplyDelete